We use necessary cookies to run the website, and analytics cookies only if you accept them. Cookie policy

← Blog

How to Scale a Coliving Portfolio from One Building to Ten

· Head of Living, UrbanPay4 min

Most coliving businesses that struggle do not fail at their first building. They fail somewhere between the third and the tenth, when the habits that worked for 80 rooms meet a portfolio of 800. My guide on how to start a coliving business covered the first building. This one covers what comes next.

The sector is scaling fast. The Coliving Report 2025, a survey of 21 operators, found the average portfolio grew 51% in a year, from 632 to 955 units, with occupancy around 93% and an average stay of 13 months. Growth on that scale exposes every weak process at once.

Prove building one before you sign building two

Investors now want to see profitability at the property level before they back expansion. That means a full year of real numbers: occupancy, average rent, average stay, operating costs per room and the cost of each turnover. A pitch deck model is not enough.

It also means being honest about what made building one work. If the founder runs community events personally and answers every resident message, that is a cost the model has not priced yet.

Know what breaks at building three

In my conversations with operators, the same five things break at around the third building:

  1. Finance: each building often sits in its own company, with its own bank account. Reconciling rent across three entities by hand eats the finance team's week.
  2. Onboarding: each site manager verifies residents and signs contracts slightly differently, and the quality drifts.
  3. Community: one community manager cannot cover three buildings, and the experience thins out.
  4. Maintenance: supplier contracts negotiated building by building cost more and get handled inconsistently.
  5. Reporting: investors and lenders ask for occupancy, arrears and collection data per asset. If it lives in spreadsheets, every report becomes a project.

None of these are demand problems. They are process problems, and they get more expensive with every building you add.

Standardise before you replicate

Before building three, write the playbook down. Cover the contract templates, the house rules, the onboarding steps, brand standards, the community calendar and the maintenance checklists. Then choose one set of tools for every site, not one per city.

The test is simple: could a new site manager open your next building using only the playbook and the tools? If the answer is no, you are not ready to scale.

Structure the entities, but run one back office

Lenders and investors often require each building to sit in its own company. That is sensible for financing and risk. It should not mean a separate operation per building.

The operators who scale well keep a single back office across all their entities. One place to verify residents, one contract flow, one view of collections, with every payment landing in the right entity's ledger automatically. I described the multi-city version of this problem in where remote-worker demand moves next.

Hire for building three, not building ten

The first hires that pay for themselves are a head of operations who owns the playbook, a finance controller who owns reconciliation and reporting, and a community lead who sets standards across sites. Operators in the Coliving Report grew their teams 21% in a year, to an average of 34 people. Growing headcount in step with rooms is the trap. The goal is to grow rooms faster than headcount.

Fund growth without overleveraging

The UK's best-known early operator, The Collective, went into administration in 2021. Investors who lived through it say the cause was too much debt, not weak demand for coliving. Banks now provide about 27% of operator funding, according to the Coliving Report, and that brings covenants with it. Match your growth to what your cash flow can carry. How to raise capital for a living platform covers the options.

Where UrbanPay fits

UrbanPay's multi-entity structure was built for exactly this stage. An operator runs identity verification, eIDAS-compliant contract signing and account-to-account collection for every building and every company under one account. Payments reconcile automatically to the right room and the right entity. Opening building four then means adding a project, not a new stack. The flex living solution page shows the setup, and the 5 C's of coliving covers the resident side of growth.

FAQ

When is a coliving operator ready to open a second building?

When building one has a full year of profitable, documented operations and a written playbook that someone other than the founder could follow.

Should each coliving building be its own company?

Often yes, because lenders and investors ask for it. Keep a single back office across those companies so verification, contracts and collection stay consistent.

What is the biggest risk when scaling coliving?

Growing faster than your processes and your balance sheet. Most failures in the sector trace back to leverage and operational strain rather than a lack of residents.

Talk to Óscar

If you run a coliving, flex living or student housing operation and want to see how collection, verification and contract signing fit together on your volumes, book 20 minutes with me or write directly.

Book 20 minutes with Óscar · [email protected] · Contact UrbanPay

Sources

Want to see how UrbanPay would solve this for your portfolio?

Talk to the team